 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
City Creek Development - Points of Concern
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
It is responsible development when existing neighborhoods are not damaged, the developer has the opportunity to make a profit, and Pocatello has homes to attract neighbors who will contribute as much as they receive. |
|
| |
* Situation: Preliminary approval has been given for over 66 houses to be built on what was only 11 lots, adjacent to City Creek, and on a dead-end extension of South Lincoln.
|
|
| |
* Neighborhoods were not informed of the plan by the developer, or by notice to allow participation in the planning and review process.
- The proposed "City Creek Subdivision" was reviewed based on a zoning map open space factor (OSF) of 2.3, when the ordinance worksheet required an OSF of 15.
- FFRD's legal counsel stated that the "City Creek Subdivision" cannot be approved until adoption of ordinances implementing the 2003 comprehensive plan.
|
|
|
| |
- Violates ordinance under which staff requires: traffic impact studies, approval of SE Idaho Dept. of Health, and a statement of how carries out Comprehensive Plan.
|
|
| |
* Perception Factors. Neighborhood and city residents, City Creek recreational users, professional planners and economists have identified off site negative impacts including:
Traffic issues: Access road design factors such as width, grade, curbing; vehicle volume, speed, noise; neighborhood children and elderly safety; delivery access.
-
Safety issues: Grass fire safety, police-fire-ambulance access; only one way in-out of the proposed development.
-
Property value issues: Loss of "walkable-livable neighborhood" quality of life; traffic impact exacerbated by possible changes to adjoining streets (Lincoln, Whitman, & Johnson) parking, street width, one-way designation, etc.
-
Storm water issues: runoff erosion and flooding similar to east bench situations
-
City Creek recreation ecosystem issues: Quality of recreation loss: concerns ranging from lost habitat for birds and wildflowers to noise and privacy.
-
Water-sewer impact: City aquifer and sewer capacity and costs to expand.
-
Costs: No cost/benefit analysis for the city. Widening streets, replace bridges, future bench expansion costs, wells, lower values-less taxes. On the average, for every $1 from subdivision development, there is a $1.15 in cost.
-
No housing need: Pocatello has lost population; over 20% of our market is from speculative investment, the first market to die when interest rates change.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
© Families For Responsible Development - All Rights Reserved |
|